“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past”

George Orwell – British author

My great great grandfather William and his wife Jane emigrated to Australia from the Orkney Islands, north of Scotland in the late 1850s. Initially he worked as indentured shepherd on a squatters run (sheep station) before conditionally purchasing land on which to farm. According to family ‘history’ he carried a newspaper clipping of the sinking of the ‘Dunbar’ in his wallet.

The ‘Dunbar’ was a sailing ship that operated on the Britain to Australia route in the 1850s. It was the pride of the Dunbar company fleet. It was modern (for those days) and fast. On the evening of 20^th August 1857, the ‘Dunbar’ was wrecked whilst attempting to enter Sydney Harbour during a storm. There was only one survivor and 121 perished, many of whom were prominent and wealthy Sydney residents returning from England. The impact on the small Sydney community was immense. Many of the citizens viewed the wreck from the cliffs near the entrance to Sydney Harbour, witnessing bodies washing up and sharks feeding on the carcasses along with the wreck debris. An inquest was held within a week of the sinking. After only one day it found that the cause of the tragedy was an ‘error of judgement’ and ‘did not attach any blame to Captain Green or his officers’. However, this did not stop the politicians and the local media of the day in particular, from blaming the dead captain for the tragedy. It was far better to blame the dead captain than the contributing factors of the inadequate pilot service, lack of lights at the entrance to the harbour or the poor location of the Macquarie lighthouse.

So why did William carry this clipping in his wallet?

Because he and his wife were booked to sail on ‘The Dunbar’ and escaped certain death?

An interesting family story, but was it true?

The ship William and Jane sailed on, the ‘John Bunyan’ left Liverpool on 9^th August 1857 and arrived in Sydney on 27^th October 1857. The ‘Dunbar’ left Plymouth on 31^st May 1857 and was wrecked on 20^th August 1857. There are two inconsistencies here. The ‘Dunbar’ left Plymouth over two months before the ‘John Bunyan’ sailed from Liverpool. It is extremely unlikely that William and Jane would have been in England two months before they sailed. They were poor immigrants from the wet and windy Orkneys. They could not have survived this period of time waiting in England. The second inconsistency was that they left from Liverpool, a far closer port to Scotland than Plymouth which is located in the south of England.

So, the story was simply ‘family folklore’.

What are the lessons here for managers?

Don’t believe everything that you are told?

Check your facts and get to the source and question everything?

How often in organisations, is a person used as a scapegoat to ‘rewrite’ the organisation’s ‘history’ and justify new management?

In the book 1984 by Eric Blair (better known as George Orwell), the ‘hero’ of the novel, Winston Smith was introduced to the concept of ‘re-writing’ history when working at the Ministry of Truth. The Party understood that by rewriting the events of the past and controlling the narrative of history, they could maintain their position of authority. Captain Green of the ‘Dunbar’ was made a scapegoat for the tragedy. This often happens in organisations and in politics.

Note: There may be another explanation for the newspaper clipping story. The Captain and Second Officer were both from Orkney. They could have been known to my ancestors, although that is unlikely as they were from different islands – or perhaps they ‘felt lucky’ that they did not suffer the same fate as the passengers and crew on the ‘Dunbar’. By the time my ancestors arrived in late October 1857, Sydney was enmeshed in the ‘Dunbar’ tragedy – there had been wide media coverage, several books had been written, paintings completed, and artifacts from the wreck sold. They certainly would have known about the tragedy.

Who knows?

#thenetworkofconsultingprofessionals